Search QCEA
QCEA Blog: recent activity-
Publication Topics
African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of states Alternatives to imprisonment Climate change CO2 emissions Common Defence and Security Policy Conflict prevention Conscientious objection Council of Europe (Strasbourg) Criminal justice Democratic governance Deutsche Ausgabe Economic justice Energy efficiency European Commission (EC) European External Action Service (EEAS) European Parliamentary elections 2009 European Security Research Programme European Union (EU) European values Financial Perspectives Foreign relations Horizon 2020 Research Programme Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms Israel Mainstreaming conflict prevention Member States of the European Union (MS) Middle East Nabucco gas pipeline Occupied Palestinian Territories Peace Peace-building Prison Programme Assistants QCEA Representatives Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA) Quaker Ffriends Sustainability Sustainable consumption and production Sustainable energy security The United Kingdom (UK) Treaty of Lisbon Treaty of Nice United Nations (UN) Women in Prison Édition française
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Translate
Tag Archives: Mainstreaming conflict prevention
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention – A Study of EU Development Cooperation with ACP Countries
Development cooperation is an important part of EU relations with developing countries, and the link between development and conflict prevention is increasingly being realised by the EU as well as by other donors. Development cooperation is likewise highlighted in the Commission Communication from 2001 as a policy area where conflict prevention needs to be … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Somalia Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Somalia. The purpose of this project is to serve … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Fiji Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Fiji. The purpose of this project is to serve … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention Report – A Study of EU Action in ACP Countries
The EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into all elements of its programming and policy-making in 2001. Mainstreaming conflict prevention means that conflict prevention should be systematically incorporated into all areas of EU policy and engagement in third countries. This implies conflict-sensitivity in all areas of programming. QCEA studied the impact that this new approach has had on EU action in the ACP-countries and this is one of two reports published on this subject.
Of the wide range of issues in which the EU is involved, this study identified seven thematic areas on which to focus and which are explored in more detail in the report:
- disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR), including child soldiers
- small arms and light weapons (SALW)
- security sector reform (SSR)
- political dialogue, including good governance, elections and civil society consultation
- gender
- management of natural resources
- transitional justice
Read “Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention – A Study of EU Action in ECP Countries” (pdf – 412kB) >>>
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention – Uganda Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Uganda. The purpose of this project is to serve as an educational tool about ACP-EU conflict prevention rather than to evaluate what the EU is doing with regard to conflict prevention.
Read “A Study of EU Action in ACP Countries – Uganda Case Study” (pdf – 337kB) > > >
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Sudan Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Sudan. The purpose of this project is to serve … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Nigeria Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Nigeria. The purpose of this project is to serve … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Haiti Case Study
In 2001 the EU introduced the approach of ‘mainstreaming’ conflict prevention into its Partnership Agreement with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. QCEA carried out case studies on six ACP countries and this report looks at the EU conflict prevention programme in Haiti. The purpose of this project is to serve … More…
Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention in ACP Countries – Conclusions and Recommendations for the EU
This is the last section of the report Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention – A Study of EU Action in ACP Countries. This section includes conclusions, questions and recommendations generated from research into the EU’s conflict prevention initiatives. Read “Mainstreaming Conflict Prevention – A Study of EU Action in ACP Countries : … More…
Report: Peace and Peacebuilding
The 2006 QCEA Conference focused on the role of the European Union in peacebuilding, within both a global and a European context. The first part of the publication consists of two papers. The first is a review of some of the definitional issues which underlie much of the discussion we had … More…
